News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 MLA rejects ultimatum 

MLA rejects ultimatum

14 Jun, 2011 07:09 AM
THE meat industry has refused a federal government demand to partly refund levies collected from cattle farmers as compensation for the suspension of live exports to Indonesia.

Yesterday, as Indonesia signalled its hopes that trade could resume within two to three weeks, Meat and Livestock Australia has rejected an ultimatum sent by the Agriculture Minister, Senator Joe Ludwig, over the weekend to either voluntarily release an initial $5 million of industry funds to compensate farmers, or be forced to do so by law.

After reportedly seeking legal advice, the Herald understands that an emergency meeting of MLA executives on Sunday night voted to reject the government's demand.

The company plans to inform the government of its decision today. In the letter sent to the MLA's chairman, Don Heatley, the minister suggests funds collected from cattle farmers in the form of levies could be used to give initial relief under the auspices of marketing and promotion.

''I would expect that in the first instance, $5 million could be made available as an initial contribution to a contingency fund for industry,'' Senator Ludwig wrote.

''Alternatively, I would propose to use my powers under section 69(3) of the AMLI Act to direct MLA to use marketing and promotion funds to manage the immediate domestic supply impacts of the suspension to trade.''

The MLA could not be contacted yesterday. However, the Cattle Council of Australia, which also receives cattle farmers' levies, has come out in support of the MLA's stance.

''[The] Cattle Council is strongly of the view that grass-fed-beef levies are best utilised on industry initiatives that are directly aimed at delivering services that facilitate a recommencement of trade as soon as possible,'' the council's acting president, Andrew Ogilvie, said.

The chairman of the Australian Beef Association, Brad Bellinger, said both industry bodies were acting out of self-interest.

''The minister should force them to release the $40 million in the levy reserve fund,'' he said. ''The money is there and meant to be used in an emergency. This is an emergency.''

Mr Bellinger said there were about 20,000 cattle held up at Port Hedland, Darwin and Townsville. Costing $8 a head to feed, the daily bill was $160,000.

After meeting a delegation from Canberra yesterday, the Indonesian Vice-Minister for Agriculture, Dr Bayu Krisnamurthi, said Australian officials assured him the live cattle trade would resume ''as soon as possible''.

''[It] looks like the cattle trade will resume in two to three weeks at the earliest,'' Dr Krisnamurthi said.

Industry sources, however, said it would likely take a few weeks longer to bed down the arrangement, which must be preceded by the development of new animal welfare standards and a survey of Indonesian feedlots and abattoirs by Australian officials and an independent vet.

Yesterday the RSPCA and Animals Australia denounced the decision to use the World Organisation of Animal Health standards as a benchmark for the review.

Those standards were lower than those used in Australia, the animal welfare groups said, and did not mandate the use of stun guns, nor preclude the roping of animals' legs prior to slaughter.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
MLA is NOT the meat industry, merely a junket to feather it's nest and spread propaganda. It is well past time The Aust Beef Assn was included in discussions.
Posted by John Niven, 14/06/2011 8:44:20 AM
MLA need the money to pay the Board & Cattle Council, Sheepmeats Council & staff. Why should producers expect to benefit?
Posted by Maverick, 14/06/2011 10:16:53 AM
The MLA board selection process is one trying to be imposed on the wool industry. It shows what a discriminatory and undemocratic process can do when candidates are selected by those bodies who receive funding directly from MLA. AWI has been forbidden to participate in agri political funding and we now have a board that has done wonders in a short amount of time, being elected by the grass roots woolgrowers. Why cant the same model be employed at MLA, and do away with the 'cash for comment' State Farming body sycophants, whose snouts have been deeply entrenched in the MLA feed trough for too.
Posted by jim Hawkins, 14/06/2011 12:06:44 PM
MLA, You have been involved in devastating not only the live export, but now the entire BEEF INDUSTRY.
Posted by tj, 14/06/2011 1:16:16 PM
The Gillard govt are responsible for the cattle at wharves and additional freight to alternative markets.

The MLA funds are better spend promoting the meat industry and speeding up the process in indo.

You ABA guys should lay off and concentrate on running your farms for a while.

Posted by ??, 14/06/2011 2:18:49 PM
It seems the meat industry is a dictator when it comes to compensation to cattle farmers.

The writing is on the wall get out of the business NOW!!!

Posted by Kathleen, 14/06/2011 2:42:16 PM
MLA are Government employees and the Industry is Government construct. The government can direct MLA.

In fact the Government should disband MLA and let real producer organisation take over.

The existing levies are a TAX and go to Consolidated Revenue. The government doesn't need to fund MLA they can fund the compensation direct!

Posted by Archibald, 14/06/2011 4:58:12 PM
Andrew Olgivie I note is not a Northern Cattle producer; why should he worry he is part of the "Industry" that does not represent beef producers.
Posted by Frank The Furious Farmer., 14/06/2011 5:01:30 PM
Appalling to see MLA staff under the guise of '??' trying to play down the pressure that grass roots producers are bringing to bear on MLA and Livecorp.

Both bodies are hopelessly inadequate, and by their inactivity and poor leadership, have probably seen the end of our live sheep exports as well. Time to close down MLA.

Posted by jim Hawkins, 14/06/2011 5:18:29 PM
I don't not have much time for the MLA, in fact I think all MLA salaries should be suspended until this is sorted out.

But for the government to suggest that the MLA should pay compensation is simply a distraction.

This total ban, completely out of the blue, with no consultation, is the government's cock up and they can pay for it.


Posted by Qlander, 14/06/2011 5:26:09 PM
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Don Heatley.
Don Heatley.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Should the government compensate graziers for the impact of the suspension of live cattle exports to Indonesia?

Yes
(84%)

No
(16%)

Total Votes: 893
Poll Date: 13 June, 2011

Most popular articles




Stock & Land







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...